Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Formocresol, Glutaraldehyde°¡ À¯°ß °è½ÂÄ¡ Ä¡¹è ¹× ÁÖÀ§Á¶Á÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ º´¸®Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

THE EFFECTS OF FORMOCRESOL AND GLUTARALDEHYDE ON THE PERFORATED INTERRADICULAR TISSUES AND TOOTH GERMS OF PRIMARY TEETH IN DOGS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1981³â 8±Ç 1È£ p.55 ~ 63
±èÁ¶ÀÚ, Á¤Àç¿ë,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁ¶ÀÚ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³
Á¤Àç¿ë (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â »ýÈÄ 3°³¿ù ¹Ì¸¸ÀÇ À¯°ßÀÇ À¯±¸Ä¡¿¡¼­ Ä¡¼ö°­ÀúÀÇ Ä¡±ÙÀÌ°³ºÎ¸¦ õ°ø½ÃÄÑ ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀ¸
·Î Ä¡Á¶°ñ¿¡ ¼Õ»óÀ» ÁØ ÈÄ ¼Õ»óºÎÀ§¿¡ »ý¸®Àû ½Ä¿°¼ö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇϰųª formocresol ¶Ç´Â
gktaraldehyde¸¦ µµÆ÷ÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼ú½ÄÀÌ ¿µ±¸Ä¡ Ä¡¹è ¹× ÁÖÀ§Á¶Á÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©
º´¸® Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î °üÂûÇÑ ¹Ù ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡¼­´Â Á¤»óÀûÀÎ Ä¡À¯°úÁ¤À» º¸¿´°í ½ÇÇè 16ÀÏ¿¡ ¼Õ»óºÎÀÇ »óÇÇÈ­°¡ ¿Ï¼ºµÇ¾úÀ½
À» °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿°Áõ¼º ¹ÝÀÀÀº ¼Õ»óºÎ Ç¥¸é¿¡ ±¹ÇѵǾúÀ¸¸ç ±× ¿ÜÀÇ °ñ ¹× °ñ¼öÁ¶Á÷Àº Á¤»ó
ÀÌ¿´°í ¿µ±¸Ä¡ Ä¡¹èÁ¶Á÷µµ Á¤»óÀÌ¿´´Ù.
2. FormocresolµµÆ÷±º°ú glutaraldehydeµµÆ÷±ºÀÇ Á¶Á÷¹ÝÀÀÀº µ¿ÀÏÇÏ¿´°í ¿°Áõ¼º ¹ÝÀÀÀº ´ë
Á¶±º¿¡ ºñÇØ °æ¹ÌÇÏ¿´À¸³ª Ç¥¸é »óÇÇÈ­´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Áö¿¬µÇ¾ú´Ù.
3. FormocresolµµÆ÷±º°ú glutaraldehydeµµÆ÷±ºÀº Ç¥Ãþ °ñ¼öÁ¶Á÷¿¡ ±«»ç¸¦ À¯¹ß½ÃÄ×°í ½ÇÇè
24ÀÏ¿¡¼­ ¿µ±¸Ä¡ Ä¡¹è »óºÎÀÇ °ñÁ¶Á÷ Á߾Ӻΰ¡ ¼Ò½ÇµÇ°í °áüÁ¶Á÷À¸·Î ´ëÄ¡µÇ¾î ¼Õ»óºÎ Ç¥
ÃþÀÇ ¿¬Á¶Á÷°ú ¿µ±¸Ä¡ Ä¡¹è »óºÎÀÇ ¿¬Á¶Á÷ÀÌ ¿¬°áµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ÀÜ¿©°ñ¸é¿¡¼­ ÆÄ°ñ Çö»óÀÌ ¿Õ¼º
ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
4. FormocresolµµÆ÷±º°ú glutaraldehydeµµÆ÷±º¿¡¼­ ¿µ±¸Ä¡¹èÀÇ ¼Õ»óÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù
5. ForrmcresolµµÆ÷±º°ú glutaraldehydeµµÆ÷±º¿¡¼­ ¾çÃø Ä¡±ÙÀº Á¤»óÀ̾úÀ¸³ª ¼Õ»óºÎ ±Ùó
ÀÇ Ä¡±ÙÀÇ ¹é¾ÆÁú°ú »ó¾ÆÁúÀÇ ºÎºÐÀûÀÎ Èí¼ö»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study is to observe the effect of formocresol and glutaraldehyde to
tooth germs and periapical tissues after perforation of interradicular portion of pulpal
floor and application of physiological saline solution in control groups, formocresol and
glutaraldehyde in experimental groups.
The following results were obtained
1. In control groups, normal healing processes were seen, and, on the sixteenth day,
the epithelization of injured areas was completed. Inflammatory reactions were limited to
the injured surface, and the underlying alveolar bone were normal and successive tooth
germs were normal.
2. In both formocresol groups and glutaraldehyde groups, tissue reactions were
identical. Inflammatory reactions were slightly compared with control groups, but the
surface epithelizations were delayed compared with control group.
3. In both formocresol and glutaraldehyde groups, necrosis was seen in superficial
tissue of bone marrow, and. at 24th day, conter area of bone marrow on the successive
tooth therms were rosed and replaced with connective tissue, and superficial soft tissue
of the injured area was connected with soft tissue on the successive tooth germ. In
remaining alveolar bone, osteoclastic reaction was remarkable.
4. In both formocresol and glutaraldehyde groups, there is no injury to the successive
tooth germs.
5. In both formocresol and glutaraldehyde groups, periodontal membrane was normal,
but the partial resorption of cementum and dentin near the injured area were seen.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI